October
06

augustine.jpgDr. James Bradley says, “God regards your actions in grace, doing good works, as meritorious - your works are rewarded; they are meritorious works!” Well how could he say such as thing? He says this because it is true, under the conditions of grace. He mentions how Augustine says that “when God crowns our works He is crowning His own works - His own grace” (slightly paraphrased).

Bradley then goes on to quote Augustine by saying that all merits are a gifts from God! The beginning and end of salvation are tied by God’s grace and include works. He is essentially saying that salvation is eschatological and that salvation cannot be reduced to some sort of half-a-second time frame of “receiving Jesus.” It is true that we are saved from our sin instantaneously, but it is also true that we are not fully saved until the end of our days. This is why Christ says in Matthew 24:13 that “he who endures until the end shall be saved.”

If the Federal Vision crowd - as well as any other denomination that is seeking to understand justification - would just take cover under St. Augustine, many ugly fights would be resolved.  Is much of the Protestant/Reformed faith based on this type of drama-seeking? almost as if people like this drama. I sometimes wonder if it is a sort of legalism that Protestants partake in to make themselves feel like they are “wrestling with the Scriptures.”

My old Evangelical church thrived on the not-knowing. They carried their Bibles around the church; to their friends houses for dinner; nearly everywhere they went;  not because they were scholars but because it made them feel they were scholars. Their chase of the Scriptures is based on that mountain that no one can seem to conquer. But if they would just acknowledge that it was already done, and that the ride to the top is free if one wants to submit to the historical  church, then the  zeal would finally turn into maturity.

With the above paragraph said, Augustine’s view of election/salvation does seem to pose danger for some: that assurance of salvation can  be at stake, as one may always feel like they need to do more and more; and Bradley goes over this a bit. He mentions that the assurance that is seemingly missing in the epistemological aspect of Augustine’s teaching is gained in Augustine’s teaching of the Sacraments: that the Sacraments give assurance as they are distributed by the authorities that Christ has instituted - salvation is given through the Church and therefore assurance of salvation can be found there.

If one wants an existential/personal experience that is a bit more epistemological than the doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus(Outside the Church there is no salvation), then one can look to Hebrews 12 to see that those that God does not discipline are bastards. I think it is fair to say that after we have been walking with Christ for some time, we know what we can and cannot get away with - so to speak. We should be knowing and feeling the disciplines of God and be thankful for these disciplines. So lack of assurance cannot be used as a valid argument against Augustinian theology. Faith is the conduit of salvation and we need to lean on it in any time of doubt.

    Read More   

Comments

Andrew Matthews on 6 October, 2007 at 7:44 pm #

Thanks for this post, Mike. It was helpful for a recent post I did on the FV and justification.

I think I should point out that St. Augustine would have been kicked out of the modern Reformed church, so controversy is unavoidable in the present context.

Furthermore, FV does not deny merit per se but a certain construal of Christ’s imputed righteousness. Some Reformed people base our positive justification solely on the performance of Jesus’ obedience while on earth and not on his high priestly work of intercession.

While on earth, Jesus performed “one act of righteousness” which was his obedience “unto death” - the death of the cross. This was the oblation of himself he offered to accomplish the remission of sins.

After passing from death to life, Jesus now lives forever to make intercession for us. This intercessory ministry in heaven (inaugurated by his resurrection and ascension) is, I believe, the biblical explanation of our positive justification.

Many people have used the term “merit” indiscriminately without regard to the proper biblical idea of merit. James Jordan points out that Christ did not earn wages in the sense that a servant earns wages. Jesus–as God’s Son–passed through a period of trial-humiliation as a fitting prerequisite for the assumption of his royal-sacerdotal inheritance.


Mike Spreng on 6 October, 2007 at 11:02 pm #

I think you are right about Augustine being kicked out of Reformedville. Although many Reformed love to quote him. I think they really do not know him in his entirety.

One of the main reasons I put that title up is so that the search engines would catch it and these guys could see an exciting side of Augustine.

I am aware of the passive/active obedience debate. I’m with you on that, and so I guess that makes me an “F.V.er.” Christ was to be the spotless lamb. That is the primary reason why he was to be without blemish. The Second Adam issue is where it gets sticky for some. I may post something on that.


Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comments: